Chapter IV: Opening of the Tract
One
can probably guess Chick’s answer to that question, based on the information I
have already provided, but let me ignore the word “Roman” for a moment and
focus on the word “Catholic.” The
Catholic Church, along with the Orthodox Church, forms the “building block” of
traditional Christianity.[1] All modern-day Christians descend directly,
or indirectly, from Catholic-Orthodoxy.
For Chick declare that the Catholic Church is not Christian, he would
have to maintain that the other forms of Christianity, which the
Catholic-Orthodox Church held to be “heretical,” were somehow correct. Consider though his Statement of Faith.[2]
For
example, he holds to the books of the Bible, which, as we would conceive of it,
is a product of the Catholic-Orthodox Church,[3] and this
would put him in opposition to the canon of Marcion.[4] Likewise, he also holds to the Doctrine of
the Trinity, which the Catholic-Orthodox Church officially defined at the
Ecumenical Councils of Nicaea I (325 CE/AD) and Constantinople (381 CE/AD), and this
would put him in opposition to the Arians and Adoptionists/Ebionites.[5] Finally, he also holds God to be a “loving
being,” which would put him in opposition with some of the forms of Gnosticism.[6]
Billions of People have Been Deceived
If billions of people have been
“deceived,” it would seem that God would take pity on these “poor souls,” since
they were deceived outside of their control.
One of the characteristics of the God of Abraham is that he is an “all
loving being.”
At the same time though, it must be
pointed out that it is impossible to prove one religion—in this case,
Christianity— to be true, and every other religion to be false. If such a thing could be done, then no one would
state that they “believe” in this particular religion, because there would be
no “belief” involved. The religion would
not be a belief, but a fact.
The Ecumenical Movement is not of God
“Ecumenicalism,” in the modern
sense, has its origins with Protestants, not the Catholic Church.
The Catholic Charismatic Movement is not of God
This would, of course, be assuming
that Christianity, however Chick wants to define it to be, is true, and every
other religion is false—which is impossible to prove/disprove.
That Roman Catholics are Headed for a Spiritual Disaster
Would they avert “spiritual
disaster,” if they left the Roman Catholic Church for another liturgical rite
within the Catholic Church? In other
words, if they left the Roman Catholic Church for the Byzantium Catholic Church
would that help them avoid “spiritual disaster”? Many individuals, including Catholics, do not
understand the meaning behind those questions, so let me explain.
The term “Roman Catholic” refers to a
particular liturgical rite within the Catholic Church (Latin or Roman). There are 23 other liturgical rites within
the Catholic Church.[7] While the Roman/Latin rite is the largest of
these liturgical rites, it is not the only one.[8] I will mention that I do not use the
term “Roman Catholic,” unless I am referring specifically to the Roman/Latin
liturgical rite of the Catholic Church.
The Only Way to Find Out is to Check with the Word of God…the Bible
As a Christian, I certainly hold
that the Bible, both the Jewish and the Christian scriptures, is the “Word of
God,” but this is my belief as a Christian. As a historian, I cannot prove the Bible to
be the “Word of God,” and every other religion’s sacred text(s) to be
false. In other words, I cannot prove
that the Bible is correct, and that the Vedas, the sacred text of Hinduism, is
incorrect; and the same is true with a Hindu trying to prove to me that the
Vedas are the “Word of God,” and that the Bible is false.
At the same time though, I would
argue that there is more to this statement from Chick. In the past, I have heard the statement from
Protestants about how, “Catholics don’t believe/follow the Bible.” Yet, they never seem to ask themselves this
question: “If Catholics don’t
believe/follow the Bible, why do they use it?”
For
example, Catholics do not believe/follow the Vedas, and guess what, they do not
use it. Likewise, Catholics do not
believe/follow the Koran, the sacred text of the Muslims, and guess what, they
do not use that text either. Finally,
Catholics do not believe/follow the Book of Mormon, one of the sacred texts of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly called Mormons), and
guess what, they do not use that text either.
Maybe it is not an issue of Catholics believing/following the Bible, more
than it is an issue of them not believing/following the Bible in same manner as
Protestants (which is true). At the same
time though, Protestants do not believe/follow the Bible in the same manner
either (which is why there are different forms of Protestantism).
Let’s Study Helen’s Life as a Devout
Catholic
I
must point out that Chick did not draw “Helen” as “ugly.” This is something he is known to do with
individuals/groups who do not agree with him.[9]
[1]Keeping it simple, the Catholic Church and Orthodox Church were
united as one Church, Catholic-Orthodox, until the Great Schism of 1054 CE/AD.
[2]“Statement of Faith” in Chick Publications. Accessed from https://www.chick.com/information/statement-of-faith. Accessed on 25 December 2024.
[3]The Bible, as we would conceive of it, comes from the Easter Letter
of St. Athanasius of Alexandria, the Bishop of Alexandria, in 367 CE/AD, when
he lists the 27 books (the word “Bible” in Greek means a “collection of books”)
of the canonical New Testament, which eventually became accepted throughout the
entire Christian world.
[4]Marcion of Sinope, a second century Christian Gnostic (I will
discuss the Gnostics later), had a canon of the Bible, which rejected the
entire Hebrew Bible, or what Christians call the “Old Testament,” and contained
portions of the Gospel of Luke and 10 Letters of Paul.
[5]“Arians” comes from the teachings of Arius of Alexandria, a fourth
century presbyter/priest, who rejected the divinity of Jesus. “Adoptionists/Ebionites” is a first century
Christian “heresy,” which held that Jesus was the biological son of Mary and
Joseph. The Adoptionists/Ebionites held that while the death of Jesus did away
with the “sin offerings of the Torah/Law,” other elements of the Torah needed
to be maintained, such as the dietary laws and circumcision. Their opponents, such as Paul, referred to
them as “Judaizers.”
[6]There was not one form of Gnosticism, but many. However, many Gnostics, including Jewish
Gnostics, held that the creator god of this world, the Abrahamic God, was an
evil being—or, if not evil, stupid and ignorant.
[7]Such as the Byzantium, Alexandrian, Armenian, Maronite, etc…
[8]As I am currently writing this, there are today over one billion
members who belong to the Roman/Latin liturgical rite of the Catholic Church,
but that was not the case in 1985
when this particular Chick tract/comic was published.
[9]One example of this is Chick’s 1999 comic/tract Murph. The story centers around “Murph,” a Catholic
police officer, who is mortally wounded while trying to stop a bank
robbery. Before his death, Murph
abandons Catholicism in favor of Fundamentalist Evangelical Protestantism. When he does this, his physical appearance
changes. No longer is he drawn as
“ugly,” but as “beautiful.” See Jack T.
Chick, Murph (Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Chick Publications, 1999). Accessed from https://www.chick.com/products/tract?stk=1005&ue=d.
Accessed on 24 December 2023.


Comments
Post a Comment